| |
Sugar Substitutes—What’s Safe
and What’s Not
Main
Article page |
Beauty articles
|
Health page |
Computers|
Diseases |
Education |
Entertainment |
Family
Business |Fitness|
Fruits and Vegetables
|
Jobs |
General |
Personality|
Technology
|
Tourism |
Useful Tips
General Knowledge |
Biography Page|
Heroes & Incredible peoples
|
Inventions
Health Page|
Diseases and Remedies |
Articles|
List of diseases
Story at-a-glance
-
Sugar substitutes can be divided into four general categories:
artificial sweetener, sugar alcohols, natural sweeteners, and dietary
supplements such as Stevia and Lo Han
-
Artificial sweeteners can actually be far worse for you than sugar and
fructose, and scientific evidence backs up that conclusion
-
Furthermore, numerous studies show they increase weight gain and worsen
insulin sensitivity to a greater degree than sugar
-
Natural sweeteners such as honey and agave may seem like a healthier
choice, but not only are they loaded with fructose, many are also highly
processed
-
In moderation, some sugar alcohols can be a better choice than highly
refined sugar, fructose or artificial sweeteners. Of the various sugar
alcohols, xylitol is one of the best. When it is pure, the potential
side effects are minimal
-
Three of the best sugar substitutes are all-natural Stevia from the
whole plant, Lo Han Guo, and dextrose (pure glucose). Contrary to
fructose, glucose can be used directly by every cell in your body and as
such is a far safer sugar alternative
By Dr. Mercola
With all the dire health effects
associated with refined sugar and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), many
wonder what, if anything, is actually safe to use to sweeten your foods
and beverages.
It’s certainly a good question.
You do have to be cautious when choosing an alternative, as
many sweeteners that are widely regarded as "healthy" are, in reality,
anything but. A previous National Geographic article1
set out to compare eight different sugar substitutes, which fall into
four general categories:
- Artificial sweeteners
- Sugar alcohols
- Natural sweeteners
- Dietary supplements
Sadly lacking from their review are any
notations about adverse health effects of many of the sugar substitutes
tested.
Despite copious scientific evidence of
harm, artificial sweeteners, for example, are promoted in the featured
article, and by “experts” in general, as safe because they “pass through
your body undigested.” Needless to say, safety concerns will be front
and center in this article.
Continued down....
The Case Against Artificial Sweeteners
Sweetener lesson 101: Avoid artificial
sweeteners like the plague. While the mechanisms of harm may differ,
they’re all harmful in one way or another. This includes
aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal),
sucralose (Splenda),
saccharin (Sweet'N Low),
acesulfame potassium,
neotame, and others.
Twenty years ago I wasn’t sure, but now
there's little doubt in my mind that artificial sweeteners can be far
worse for you than sugar and fructose, and there is plenty of scientific
evidence to back up that conclusion. In fact, there’s enough evidence
showing the dangers of consuming artificial sweeteners to fill an entire
book -- which is exactly why I wrote
Sweet Deception.
Aspartame is perhaps the most dangerous of the bunch. At least it’s
one of the most widely used and has the most reports of adverse effects.
There are also hundreds of scientific
studies demonstrating its harmful effects.
This is why it’s so frustrating to see
big companies like Coca-Cola Company purposely deceive you on this
issue, which is exactly what they’re currently doing with their “public
service” announcement-type ads, in which they “affirm” aspartame’s
safety and benefits.
Center for Science in the Public
Interest’s (CSPI) Executive Director Michael F. Jacobson issued the
following statement in response to Coca-Cola’s new ad:2
“Aspartame has been found
to cause cancer3—leukemia,
lymphoma, and other tumors—in laboratory animals, and it
shouldn’t be in the food supply. We certainly want Coca-Cola to
shift its product mix toward lower- and no-calorie drinks, but
aspartame’s reputation isn’t worth rehabilitating with this
propaganda campaign.
The company would be better off
phasing out its use of aspartame and accelerating its research into
safer, natural sweeteners such as those extracted from the stevia
plant.”
Don’t Fall for Coca-Cola’s Deceptive
“Public Announcement” Ads
Besides pulling the wool over your eyes
with regards to the lack of overall safety of aspartame, I think the FTC
would be warranted to sue Coke and the other diet soda manufacturers for
fraudulent advertising, seeing how:
- There’s no scientific evidence
showing that the use of diet sodas actually lead to weight loss.
On the contrary, studies have
repeatedly shown that artificial sweeteners cause greater
weight gain than regular sugar.4
Studies have also repeatedly linked artificial sweeteners with
increased hunger. For example, one study published in the journal
Physiology & Behavior in 19885
found that intense (no- or low-calorie) sweeteners can produce
significant changes in appetite. Of the three sweeteners tested,
aspartame produced the most pronounced effects.
- Scientific evidence shows that
aspartame actually
worsens insulin sensitivity to a greater degree than sugar.
This is quite the blow for diabetics
who obediently follow the recommendation to switch to diet sodas to
manage their condition. Unfortunately, in large part due to
misleading and deceptive advertising, many doctors and registered
nutritionists are still under the illusion that artificial
sweeteners are a safe and effective alternative for their diabetic
patients.
Artificial sweeteners also appear
to cause many of the same health effects associated with high sugar
consumption. Most recently, a report published in the journal
Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism6
highlighted the fact that diet soda drinkers suffer the same exact
health problems as those who opt for regular soda, including excessive
weight gain, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and
stroke.7,
8 According to the
authors:
“This paper... considers the
hypothesis that consuming sweet-tasting but noncaloric or
reduced-calorie food and beverages interferes with learned responses
that normally contribute to glucose and energy homeostasis. Because
of this interference, frequent consumption of high-intensity
sweeteners may have the counterintuitive effect of inducing
metabolic derangements.”
So the very reason anyone would consider
using diet instead of sugared sweeteners has no basis in fact. Anyone
using them would get the same problems as using regular sugar and
expose themselves to the well documented risks of artificial sweeteners.
Be Critical of “All Natural” Sweetener
Claims
With artificial sweeteners are out of
the picture, let’s look at some all-natural sweeteners. Natural
sweeteners such as honey and agave may seem like a healthier choice, but
not only are they loaded with
fructose, many are also highly processed. In that regard, you’re not
gaining a thing. The health effects will be the same, since it’s the
fructose that causes the harm.
Agave syrup can even be considered worse than HFCS because
it has a higher fructose content than any commercial sweetener, ranging
from 70 to 97 percent depending on the brand. HFCS, in comparison,
averages 55 percent fructose. What’s worse, most agave "nectar" or agave
"syrup" is nothing more than a laboratory-generated super-condensed
fructose syrup, devoid of virtually all nutrient value.
Honey is also high in fructose, averaging around 53 percent, but
contrary to agave it is completely natural in its raw form,
and has many health benefits when used in moderation. Keep in
mind you’re not likely to find high quality raw honey in your local
grocery store. Most of the commercial Grade A honey is highly processed
and of poor quality. All in all, it’s important to realize that
regardless of the source (be it HFCS, honey or agave), refined
fructose:
- Tricks your body into gaining
weight by fooling your metabolism, as it turns off your body's
appetite-control system. Fructose does not appropriately stimulate
insulin, which in turn does not suppress ghrelin (the "hunger
hormone") and doesn't stimulate leptin (the "satiety hormone"),
which together result in your eating more and developing insulin
resistance.
- Activates a key enzyme that causes
cells to store fat; this is the so-called “fat
switch” revealed in Dr. Richard Johnson’s book by the same name.
- Rapidly leads to weight gain and
abdominal obesity ("beer belly"), decreased HDL, increased LDL,
elevated triglycerides, elevated blood sugar, and high blood
pressure—i.e., classic metabolic syndrome.
- Is broken down in your liver
just like alcohol, and produces many of the side effects of chronic
alcohol use, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Interestingly enough, research has shown that soft drinks increase
your risk of NAFLD independently of metabolic syndrome9.
- Over time leads to insulin
resistance, which is not only an underlying factor of type 2
diabetes and heart disease, but also many cancers.
What About Sugar Alcohols?
Sugar alcohols can be identified by the
commonality of “ol” at the end of their name, such as xylitol glucitol,
sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol, glycerol, and lactitol. They’re not as
sweet as sugar, and they do contain fewer calories, but they’re not
calorie-free. So don’t get confused by the “sugar-free” label on foods
containing these sweeteners. As with all foods, you need to carefully
read the food labels for calorie and carbohydrate content, regardless of
any claims that the food is sugar-free or low-sugar.
One reason that sugar alcohols provide
fewer calories than sugar is because they’re not completely absorbed
into your body. Because of this, eating too many foods containing sugar
alcohols can lead to abdominal gas and diarrhea. It’s also worth noting
that maltitol, a commonly used sugar alcohol, spikes blood sugar almost
as much as a starchy new potato. Xylitol, in comparison, does not have a
great effect on your blood sugar, so from that perspective may be a
better choice.
So, in moderation, some sugar alcohols
can be a better choice than highly refined sugar, fructose or artificial
sweeteners. Of the various sugar alcohols, xylitol is one of the best.
When it is pure, the potential side effects are minimal, and it actually
comes with some benefits such as fighting tooth decay. All in all, I
would say that xylitol is reasonably safe, and potentially even a mildly
beneficial sweetener. (As a side note,
xylitol is toxic to dogs and some other animals, so be sure to keep
it out of reach of your family pets.)
Three of the Safest Sugar-Alternatives
Two of the best sugar substitutes are
from the plant kingdom:
Stevia and Lo Han Guo (also spelled Luo Han Kuo). Stevia, a highly
sweet herb derived from the leaf of the South American stevia plant, is
sold as a supplement. It’s completely safe in its natural form and can
be used to sweeten most dishes and drinks.
Keep in mind that the same cannot be
said for the sugar substitute
Truvia, which makes use of only certain active ingredients and
not the entire plant. Rebaudioside A is the agent that provides
most of the sweet taste of the plant. Usually it’s the synergistic
effect of all the agents in the plant that provide the overall health
effect, which oftentimes includes “built-in protection” against
potentially damaging effects, but what the FDA has approved as GRAS
(generally recognized as safe) are just a couple of the active
ingredients, including rebaudioside A used in Truvia.
In one toxicology review,10
the researchers point out that stevioside compounds and rebaudioside A
are metabolized at different rates, making it impossible to assess the
risk of rebaudioside A from toxicity assessments of stevioside (which
has been used as food and medicine in Japan and South America for
decades or longer). Additionally, in a human metabolism study,
stevioside and rebaudioside A had different pharmacokinetic results. In
layman’s terms, that means that your body reacts differently to the two
compounds; each compound is metabolized differently and remains in your
body for different lengths of time.
Truvia may turn out to be a
very good substitute to sugar, but I’d have to see more details before
giving it an enthusiastic thumbs-up – for the same reason the FDA uses
as the basis for their refusal to consider Stevia GRAS: there’s just not
enough evidence to prove its safety. Lo Han Kuo is another natural
sweetener similar to Stevia, but it's a bit more expensive and harder to
find. In China, the Lo Han fruit has been used as a sweetener for
centuries, and it’s about 200 times sweeter than sugar. It received FDA
GRAS status in 2009.
A third alternative is to use pure
glucose. You can buy pure glucose (dextrose) for about $5-7 per pound.
It is only 70 percent as sweet as sucrose, so you'll end up using a bit
more of it for the same amount of sweetness, making it slightly more
expensive than regular sugar—but still well worth it for your health as
it does not contain any fructose whatsoever. Contrary to
fructose, glucose can be used directly by every cell in your body and as
such is a far safer sugar alternative.
Consider Dampening Your Sweet-Tooth...
Keep in mind though that if you have
insulin issues, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or if
you're overweight, you'd be best to avoid all sweeteners, including
Stevia, Lo Han and dextrose, since any sweetener can decrease
your insulin sensitivity. (Most important of all, remember that this
goes for artificial sweeteners too!) If you're having trouble weaning
yourself off sweet foods and beverages, try
Turbo Tapping. It’s a clever use of the Emotional Freedom Techniques
(EFT), specifically designed to resolve many aspects of an addiction in
a concentrated period of time.
Tell Coke They're a Joke!
Obesity and related metabolic diseases
are serious public health problems in the United States, and you are
being sorely misled by companies pretending to have a solution that, in
reality, only worsen the problem. I strongly urge you to let the
Coca-Cola Company know how you feel by telling them to stop their
deceptive marketing of soda products. Especially their fake “public
announcement” ads for aspartame.
Join me in taking a stand against false
advertising and let your voice be heard. If you’re on twitter, send a
tweet to #CokeCEO to let the Coca-Cola Company know you are not happy
with their deceptive advertising. If you’re on Facebook, please share
your thoughts with them on their
Facebook Page. Please also
email the Coca-Cola Company to let them know how you feel!
| |
|